Or, what if Ralph Waldo Emerson had it wrong?

Ralph Waldo Emerson
The relationships between weaknesses and strengths is as complex as our personalities. We all seem to have a weakness that can cripple us. We see ourselves as an imperfect model of the perfect human being.
Who is this perfect human being we model ourselves upon? Because from this model you you get that some qualities are weaknesses and some are strengths.
And from there, that moment of dissatisfaction, we act to eliminate or ignore the weaknesses while striving to improving the strengths. Ralph Waldo Emerson said “Our strength grows out of our weaknesses” and Shailendra Singh said “If you know your strength it never becomes a weakness.”
But what if they had it wrong?
To what extent can we change weakness into a strength? Or do you ignore your weaknesses and only focus on developing your strengths? Neither, because the problem is not with the weakness or the strength but with our view of it.
It is a question of language and labeling and not of fault and failing.
There is something wrong with the idea that we consist of prepacked weaknesses and strengths. That we are imperfectly designed to do what we should be doing.
The problem is not with us
It is with the mirror.
Imagine that the mirror you view yourself in has the outline of a perfect human body painted on it. No matter what you do with yourself there is nothing you can do to make your image match the shape in the mirror.
The problem is not with you, it is the mirror that is broken. And the mindset that draws the outline.
Jack Handy got a little closer when he said “If you think a weakness can be turned into a strength, I hate to tell you this, but that’s another weakness”. But even accepting that your weaknesses will not become strenghts still locks you into the image in the broken mirror.
We are conditioned to see the world with a perspective of weakness and strength.
A sheep has a terrible weakness in that it cannot bark or bite and therefore is an abysmal watchdog. The poor sheep placed into the watchdog position is forced to work on their weaknesses and give gummy bites or bleat with a deeper voice. They will never be as good as the true watchdog.
But what of the watchdog in the field, assigned to grow wool. Poor thing, the terrible disadvantage it must overcome to succeed.
Clearly for the sheep and the dog it is a matter of placing them in the correct context and their weaknesses evaporates. Weakness and strenght is a matter of opinion, only such within certain parameters.
The context of the strong
Dominant and pervasive contexts require everybody to have certain strengths. Productivity is one of these. If you do not have the ability to be a productive getting-it-done person you are weak.
In time of war being able to kill a human being and carry on with no guilt is a strength. In a time of peace it is a delibating weakness. Yet it is not the quality that changed but the context.
Fine, anything you regard as a weakness or strength can be seen in a different light in a different context.
But how much should you accept the context imposed on you? Or should you be responsible and able to create your own reality? If you can create your own reality then you can create a reality where every one of your weaknesses becomes a strength.
Escape the duality
But you will still be caught in a duality, having to choose between things to balance. The problem is denying aspects of yourself by giving them negative connotations.
What if you do not call them weaknesses or strengths? Call them cold qualities and warm qualities. Which is better, cold or warm? It depends if you are thirsty or if you want to take a bath. Both are appropriate in the right context.
It is not a question of making your warm qualities hotter or worse, taking your cold qualities and making them lukewarm. It is a process of taking all your qualities and building a new concept of yourself and then recreating your context where your self can be a complete functioning person.
The question is not: How do I beat my weakness?
Be complete
Accepting my “weakness” as a quality without assigning it goodness or badness give me a perspective on myself as a whole person. You can be so much more than just a person consisting of a finite number of strengths while being hobbled by irrevocable faults in your make-up.
You are neither weak nor strong. You are be complete if you can only understand your completeness.
And from your completeness recreate your world.